Again, whatever you do is gravy for us.
Thar be the truth.
"A moment of rest upon the wind, and another woman shall bear me."
Again, whatever you do is gravy for us.
Liquid wrote:I'm much more interested in an "original intention" version of Infinity that Dev has teased us about for years, though a redone Physicist could be cool. I don't know. They could make a sweet double album release.
Antiyou wrote:
Hey Dev,
I think you're capabilities are greatly expanding (Addicted and Ki sound amazing). Just one fan's 2 cents though... (BTW I'm waiting for my hoodie package and couldn't resist the leak)
I would rather have a completely remixed and remastered version of Physicist than any number of re-recordings. The fact is, it's out there. You will have fans that would be alienated by new recordings. Those of us who have loved it from it's release, regardless of production value, would have a hard time identifying with the emotion on new recordings. There are things to be learned from the past. There are also ways to apply what you know today to what you've done in the past. My own personal wish would be for a 5.1 mix of the original but I would be elated with a simple stereo remix. In fact, I love Physicist so much that if you don't consider the first 2 suggestions, I'd be thrilled if you just left it alone.
For perspective, let me tell you about Pearl Jam's Lost Dogs. Regardless of the artist, it's the substance of the story that matters. There is a "holy grail bootleg recording" of a song they did in the 90's (Hard to Imagine for those who care). When they did their rarties collection (Lost Dogs) numerous parts of original recording sessions from the early 90's were used with updated current sessions. For many fans, this set was a total disappointment as it was not sold as advertised. Everyone expected to hear their favourite bootleg recordings in full studio quality for the 1st time. Well, we got 90's drums and guitars with 2005 vocals and keyboards. The fans had learned to love the rawness of the boots and even to appreciate the mistakes or vocal flubs. The newer versions sound empty and without the passion of the originals. To this day, I will only listen to a static laden mono recording of that song because it conveys the power and emotion I have identified with the song.
It's your music and your right to do with it whatever you choose. I just thought if you happened to skim this post, there is another perspective for you to consider.
FTB wrote:Antiyou wrote:
Hey Dev,
I think you're capabilities are greatly expanding (Addicted and Ki sound amazing). Just one fan's 2 cents though... (BTW I'm waiting for my hoodie package and couldn't resist the leak)
I would rather have a completely remixed and remastered version of Physicist than any number of re-recordings. The fact is, it's out there. You will have fans that would be alienated by new recordings. Those of us who have loved it from it's release, regardless of production value, would have a hard time identifying with the emotion on new recordings. There are things to be learned from the past. There are also ways to apply what you know today to what you've done in the past. My own personal wish would be for a 5.1 mix of the original but I would be elated with a simple stereo remix. In fact, I love Physicist so much that if you don't consider the first 2 suggestions, I'd be thrilled if you just left it alone.
For perspective, let me tell you about Pearl Jam's Lost Dogs. Regardless of the artist, it's the substance of the story that matters. There is a "holy grail bootleg recording" of a song they did in the 90's (Hard to Imagine for those who care). When they did their rarties collection (Lost Dogs) numerous parts of original recording sessions from the early 90's were used with updated current sessions. For many fans, this set was a total disappointment as it was not sold as advertised. Everyone expected to hear their favourite bootleg recordings in full studio quality for the 1st time. Well, we got 90's drums and guitars with 2005 vocals and keyboards. The fans had learned to love the rawness of the boots and even to appreciate the mistakes or vocal flubs. The newer versions sound empty and without the passion of the originals. To this day, I will only listen to a static laden mono recording of that song because it conveys the power and emotion I have identified with the song.
It's your music and your right to do with it whatever you choose. I just thought if you happened to skim this post, there is another perspective for you to consider.
I couldn't disagree more. You're basically saying to Dev, "don't re-do Physicist because it will be different and the fans won't like the differences." Well of course it'll be different, that's the entire reason he wants to re-do it. It doesn't matter if fans of 'old' Physicist don't like 'new' Physicist, because they'll always have the old one, which was still written and recorded by Dev. Nothing will change that. If he only did things based solely on what it would do to his fans, we wouldn't have his masterpiece of a discography to date.
Dev, do what you want. I think that's worked well for you so far
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests