I haven't read the replies yet, but here's my opinion.
I'm a scientist ( a physicist). If I'm to be honest, I have to answer "I'm not sure". Because I can't prove that there is NO soul. I can say things like "we don't need a soul to explain how human beings work", but that is not the same as saying "there IS no soul".
It's dang near impossible to prove a negative, and if you're being honest in voicing a scientist's opinion, you should realize that. Of course, as a scientist, I might or might not believe in a soul. But belief is not the same as knowledge.
This may seem like a lot of flip-flopping, but it's at the very center of being honest: things aren't as easy as yes/no for the most occasions. And while we as scientists know a LOT about the world, nobody could claim that we know ALL about the world.
Tammo
I'm a scientist ( a physicist). If I'm to be honest, I have to answer "I'm not sure". Because I can't prove that there is NO soul. I can say things like "we don't need a soul to explain how human beings work", but that is not the same as saying "there IS no soul".
It's dang near impossible to prove a negative, and if you're being honest in voicing a scientist's opinion, you should realize that. Of course, as a scientist, I might or might not believe in a soul. But belief is not the same as knowledge.
This may seem like a lot of flip-flopping, but it's at the very center of being honest: things aren't as easy as yes/no for the most occasions. And while we as scientists know a LOT about the world, nobody could claim that we know ALL about the world.
Tammo