Talk about whatever you want to here, but stay correct

Gay as light of day or don't swing that way

14
27%
14
27%
12
23%
12
23%
0
N/A
0
N/A

#117951 by JuZ
Tue Apr 04, 2006 1:30 pm
Goat wrote:Ouch, that Manowar pic hurts.


Yeah, sorry 'bout that. Reminded me of some old Commodore 64 game-boxes... kinda disturbing now that I look back on it all.

#118200 by Goat
Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:18 am
Haha, spot on!

#126207 by Pisshead
Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:11 pm
Felt like seeing this up again, for the n00bs.

#126208 by Pisshead
Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:20 pm
Biert wrote:No thanks :) The 80s are over, it's the 2000s now :wink:


Image
Jarhead

Image
S.W.A.T.

Image
Rocky 6

The 80's never left!

Just look at todays fashion. It's coming people. Coming right up into your ass.
Last edited by Pisshead on Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

#126230 by Kaartinen
Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:57 am
I'd say that there's also the extreme side of heterosexualism to the Rambo movies. Nothing is more straight than setting an entire vietkong village on fire with arrows that have exploding tips. That is just priceless.

Although there is nothing more hetero than Chuck Norris. He is the definition for that word. He's more hetero than eating a pig that's been roasted on a bofire made out of old car tires while drinking vodka straight out of a bottle. And swearing while you're doing it.

Damn!

#126254 by Goat
Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:24 am
Exactly the opposite. The more the heterosexualism is asserted, the more it's inherent homosexual component strikes through. Setting a village on fire is totally and completely gay. And Chuck Norris is a phallus in himself, so ...

#126257 by Kivenkantaja
Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:13 am
Goat wrote:Setting a village on fire is totally and completely gay.
What is so gay in that? You are joking, right?

#126260 by Blazingmonga
Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:32 am
Kivenkantaja wrote:
Goat wrote:Setting a village on fire is totally and completely gay.
What is so gay in that? You are joking, right?


I'm sure he is joking, and means gay as in 'stupid', which is a confusing thing to say in this discussion.

Unless of course he really believes that homosexuals are noted for their pyromania.

#126262 by Pisshead
Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:38 am
Goat wrote:Exactly the opposite. The more the heterosexualism is asserted, the more it's inherent homosexual component strikes through. Setting a village on fire is totally and completely gay. And Chuck Norris is a phallus in himself, so ...


Yeah, like the blatant homosexuality exerted within an army.

Goat knows what i'm talkin' about!

#126337 by Cav
Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:05 am
Wiseblud wrote:As far as Rambo goes I would have to say that it is just below Top Gun on the "Bone-smuggle-o-meter".

Now that was a gay freeking movie. Tom cruise and Val kilmer trying to blow each other out of their cockpit by shooting cylindrical phallic tubes at each other. Need I mention that the guy sitting right behind Tom cruise name is "Goose".


'Bone-smuggle-o-meter' :lol: Love it! You can be my wingman any time, Wiseblud :wink:

I am now 7% more gay - 2% for the comment, 5% for even thinking about Top Gun...

#126341 by Mudtrailer
Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:42 am
Goat wrote:Not just action movies, aggression itself thrives on homoeroticism. Phrases like "to fuck someone up" or "your ass is mine, bitch" are neither accidental nor coincidental. It goes further: the human society is structured around the suppresed homoerotic component of our relations. Incidentally, that's why women have lower social status - they don't share our secret gay bond.

On the general level:
Men are humans with problems of homoerotic nature. Women are humans with problems caused by men who can't come to terms with their problems of homoerotic nature.

In every staight there's deffinitely a gay. And the stronger the gay call inside, the more manly/straighter one tries to appear, like in the army or gangs for instance.

Wherever you confine a group of men, as in the army or gang, prison, church, scouts, fraternities etc., the gay will come out in some form, be it head on rape, initiation rituals with more or less hushed allusions, down to aforementioned threats (not necessary realised) and even friendly wisecracks and practical jokes.


I really recommend reading "On Aggression" by Konrad Lorenz ( Nobel Prize winner) I think you would seriously rethink what you wrote. Aggression has nothing to do with homo-eroticism.

That said: Rambo movies suck. Wehter or not they are gay? hahahaha never thought about it really. Stallone is a terrible actor though.

#126354 by Pisshead
Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:03 pm
Mudtrailer wrote:That said: Rambo movies suck. Wehter or not they are gay? hahahaha never thought about it really. Stallone is a terrible actor though.


Did you really expect Kubrick level quality while settling down to a Rambo movie? I had a similar discussion with someone about Final Destination 3.

I personally find them hilarious, cheap entertainment with enough homo quotes to convince anyone. Refer to the previous page.

Plus, the Taliban are the good guys in Rambo 3! :shock:

#126380 by gozu
Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:43 am
Pisshead wrote:
Plus, the Taliban are the good guys in Rambo 3! :shock:


shit! really? hah just goes to show americas changing alliances (be it in homoeroticactioncinema style)

#126408 by Mudtrailer
Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:03 pm
Pisshead wrote:
Mudtrailer wrote:That said: Rambo movies suck. Wehter or not they are gay? hahahaha never thought about it really. Stallone is a terrible actor though.


Did you really expect Kubrick level quality while settling down to a Rambo movie? I had a similar discussion with someone about Final Destination 3.

I personally find them hilarious, cheap entertainment with enough homo quotes to convince anyone. Refer to the previous page.

Plus, the Taliban are the good guys in Rambo 3! :shock:


Talibans? they done Killed Dale Earnhardt too!!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests