Talk about whatever you want to here, but stay correct
#234192 by Antiyou
Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:11 pm
Billy Rhomboid wrote:
Antiyou wrote:I think what makes most anti-h1n1 people nervous is not the lack of evidence on the "vaccinations are evil" side it's the absolute lack of clinical studies done on the drug that is near being forced on us. Simply reading the fact sheet from GSK (the makers of the $$ er I mean drug) will tell you that they did not sufficiently test the drug before it's release and we're expected to be the guinea pigs.


This flu jab has been tested as much as the routine annual flu jab - it is not possible to have a flu vaccine that goes through the same rigorous degree of testing as other vaccines simply because it has to be produced in relation to this years illness. Flu vaccines are all prepared much the same way: the flu virus is injected into hens eggs, grown and then killed before used to make the vaccine. When injected the body mounts an immune response to the dead virus and thus prepares you for the flu ahead. There is testing done but it looks at whether or not individuals mount a response to the vaccine not whether or not its safe. The test of whether it is safe to inject the basic vaccine has been done long since. Every year thousands of people have the flu jab. Many will tell you it gave them the flu (but sitting in a waiting room full of people with coughs doesn't apparently, just the jab).

Why did you have to wear Hazmat suits to visit your mother-in-law if she was dying of a reaction to the vaccine? Had she developed something that was contagious through clothing and skin? I must say I am impressed by the lengths the medical facility went to for you though, Level A Hazmat suits (which is what you would have needed to protect against biological agents) don't leave change out of $10,000 and are, in situations like that, a single use only deal.


If you read the documentation from GSK (linked in my post), they admit it wasn't tested to other flu vaccine standards.

Well, it wasn't an E.T. lookin hazmat suit but I would liken it to the sterilization procedure and all had respirators, goggles and disposable suits. The doctors had absolutely no idea what was going on. I think they were trying to put our minds at ease with the suits (ie. whatever this is, these flimsy disposable suits will save you), although all it did was upset the women.

At the end of the day, I would have rather she took her chances without the shot. For the amount of reported cases in Canada, I think the odds were better of becoming ill from the vaccination. So, SARS hasn't killed me and I survived Swine Flu. This pandemic shit is pretty weak. What else can your christian god throw at me? I guess there's still famine and pestilence right?

My point is simply that the Canadian and US gov't's placed what was essentially open purchase orders (as much as they could make and as fast as they could make it) with GSK for an untested product (or at the very least under-studied product) and were working towards mandatory innoculations for a "pandemic" that never happened. And to top it off, at least in Canada, the gov't used the money I have already paid in taxes to cover it. Meanwhile, GSK enjoyed record setting 4th quarter vaccination sales. One does not need to believe in aliens, conspiracy theories or Alex Jones to see that we were headed down a frightening path.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests